🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “following international guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for various offences “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We live in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.