🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a better and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.