🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.