🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, coercive phone calls persisted. Originally, allegedly from a retired cop and a former defense officer, subsequently from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, a local artisan asserts he was called to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.

The leather artisan is one of many fighting a high-value initiative where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be demolished and modernized by a corporate giant.

"The unique ecosystem of this area is like nowhere else in the globe," states Shaikh. "But they want to dismantle our social fabric and stop us speaking out."

Opposing Environments

The cramped lanes of this community stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and elite residences that overshadow the area. Homes are built haphazardly and often missing basic amenities, informal businesses produce dangerous fumes and the air is permeated by the overpowering odor of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and apartments with proper sanitation is an optimistic future realized.

"There's no adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for kids to enjoy," explains a tea vendor, 56, who relocated from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The sole solution is to tear it all down and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

But others, including the leather artisan, are fighting against the redevelopment.

None deny that the slum, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is urgently needing financial support and improvement. However they fear that this initiative – absent of public consultation – might turn premium city property into a luxury development, evicting the lower-caste, working-class residents who have resided there since the nineteenth century.

These were these shunned, relocated individuals who established the empty marshland into an extensively researched phenomenon of community resilience and business activity, whose production is valued at between one million dollars and two million dollars per year, making it a major informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Out of about one million residents living in the dense 220-hectare neighborhood, less than 50% will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is expected to take seven years to complete. The remainder will be moved to undeveloped zones and saline fields on the far outskirts of the city, threatening to divide a historic community. A portion will be denied homes at all.

Residents permitted to continue living in the neighborhood will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the evolved, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has maintained the community for many years.

Industries from garment work to ceramic crafts and waste processing are expected to decrease in quantity and be transferred to an allocated "commercial zone" distant from homes.

Survival Challenge

For those such as this protester, a workshop owner and multi-generational resident to live in Dharavi, the plan presents a fundamental risk. His informal, multi-level operation creates garments – tailored coats, luxury coats, decorated jackets – marketed in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and overseas.

His family dwells in the rooms underneath and laborers and sewers – workers from north India – live on-site, enabling him to afford their labour. Beyond this community, Mumbai rents are often significantly costlier for a single room.

Harassment and Intimidation

At the government offices close by, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project depicts a contrasting outlook. Slickly dressed residents mill about on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, acquiring western-style baguettes and croissants and socializing on a terrace adjacent to a coffee shop and treat station. This depicts a world away from the affordable idli sambar morning meal and low-cost tea that maintains Dharavi's community.

"This isn't improvement for residents," explains the protester. "This constitutes a massive real estate deal that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

There is also distrust of the development company. Headed by a prominent businessman – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the Indian prime minister – the corporation has been subject to claims of favoritism and questionable practices, which it rejects.

Although the state government calls it a joint project, the business group contributed a significant amount for its 80% stake. A case claiming that the project was unfairly awarded to the corporation is pending in the top court.

Sustained Harassment

From when they initiated to vocally oppose the development, protesters and community members assert they have been experienced ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – comprising messages, clear intimidation and implications that speaking against the initiative was tantamount to speaking against the country – by figures they claim are associated with the business conglomerate.

Part of the group suspected of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c